All Aboard Planning

Takings, exactions, and property rights

Eminent domain and public use, regulatory takings tests, per se takings, and the nexus and proportionality rules for exactions.

Lesson 9 of 40 · about 28 minutes · Outline areas: 2.3 Foundational legal principles

Learning objectives

  • Explain the Takings Clause and the difference between eminent domain and regulatory takings.
  • Trace the "public use" cases from Berman to Kelo.
  • Distinguish the per se takings rules (Loretto, Lucas, Cedar Point) from the Penn Central balancing test.
  • Apply the Nollan/Dolan nexus and proportionality tests to an exaction, including after Koontz and Sheetz.
  • Recognize the procedural cases on temporary takings, moratoria, the "parcel as a whole," and access to federal court.

Key concepts

The Takings Clause

The Fifth Amendment ends: "nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." Through the Fourteenth Amendment it applies to state and local governments. The clause does two things: it permits government to take property (eminent domain), and it requires just compensation, usually fair market value, when it does.

A property owner who believes a regulation has effectively taken their property, without any formal condemnation, can sue for compensation. This is called inverse condemnation.

6 more sections follow in the full lesson.

Key terms

  • Eminent domain: The government's power to take private property for public use with just compensation.
  • Just compensation: Payment for taken property, usually fair market value.
  • Inverse condemnation: An owner's suit for compensation when government action effectively takes property without formal condemnation.
  • Regulatory taking: A regulation so burdensome it is treated as a taking.
  • Per se taking: A taking found automatically, without balancing.
  • Investment-backed expectations: An owner's reasonable expectations when acquiring or investing in property.
  • Denominator problem: The question of which property is "the parcel" when measuring a regulation's impact.
  • Exaction: A condition requiring land, improvements, or money in exchange for development approval.
  • Essential nexus: The required connection between an exaction and the project's impact.
  • Rough proportionality: The required fit between the size of an exaction and the size of the impact.
  • Moratorium: A temporary halt on certain development approvals while regulations are studied.
Open with an account

Create an account to see the rest of this lesson

Every lesson and full-length practice exam is open to you. An account keeps your scores and progress in one place so you can see where to study next.

Just looking? The list of lessons and the sample questions are open to everyone.

Practice

Ready for exam-style questions?

The checkpoints in this lesson were written for it alone, so they never give away an exam question. To see how the Fundamentals domain is tested, take a full-length practice exam. It mixes all nine domains in exam proportions, and your results point you back to the lessons behind every question you miss.

Exams need an account, so your scores are saved. Create one to get started.